<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Giving Strategies &#187; charitable industries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessgivingstrategies.com/tag/charitable-industries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessgivingstrategies.com</link>
	<description>Tips, Tools and Strategies for Strategic Business Philanthropy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Most Charitable Industries</title>
		<link>http://www.businessgivingstrategies.com/2007/03/10/most-charitable-industries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessgivingstrategies.com/2007/03/10/most-charitable-industries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charitable industries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessgivingstrategies.com/?p=713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conference Board surveyed 211 of the largest companies and corporate foundations, and found that they gave $9.78 billion in 2005, up more than 18% from the previous year. However, the findings indicate that this doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean companies have become more generous; they&#8217;re simply making more money. Other findings included: As a percentage of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Conference Board surveyed 211 of the largest companies and corporate foundations, and found that they gave $9.78 billion in 2005, up more than 18% from the previous year. However, the findings indicate that this doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean companies have become more generous; they&#8217;re simply making more money.</p>
<p>Other findings included:</p>
<li>As a percentage of pretax income, companies in the survey actually gave less to American charities in 2005&#8211;1% of their U.S. earnings, compared with 1.6% the year before.</li>
<li>Most of that money was spent in the U.S, with only $2 billion going overseas.</li>
<li>More than half of all donations were products, rather than cash.</li>
<li>The top priority for corporate givers was health care and human services, which accounted for 44% of all contributions. Education was a distant second, attracting 12% of the money. And arts, community and environmental organizations all received less than 10%.<br />
<table border="2" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Industry</th>
<th>Contributions as a % of worldwide sales</th>
<th>Contributions per employee</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pharmaceuticals</td>
<td>1.51%</td>
<td>$5,585</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Printing, publishing and media</td>
<td>0.65%</td>
<td>$1,549</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Food, beverage and tobacco</td>
<td>0.19%</td>
<td>$367</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Banks</td>
<td>0.18%</td>
<td>$713</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Precision instruments</td>
<td>0.12%</td>
<td>$258</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Computers and technology</td>
<td>0.11%</td>
<td>$339</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Telecommunications</td>
<td>0.10%</td>
<td>$329</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Utilities</td>
<td>0.08%</td>
<td>$629</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Paper and allied products</td>
<td>0.08%</td>
<td>$216</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>For more information, please go to:<a href="http://www.forbes.com/home/2007/01/16/leadership-philanthropy-charity-lead-citizen-cx_hc_0116charitable.html/">Forbes</a> or The Rocky Mountain News.</li>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessgivingstrategies.com/2007/03/10/most-charitable-industries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

